A. General Information

1. Title


2. Status of the project
3. Implementation period of the project/service:
5. Geographical coverage
6. Participating agencies/entities of the project/service:
a. Development stage
Lead agencies/entities
Other participating agencies/entities
b. Operational stage
Lead agencies/entities (op)
Other participating agencies/entities (op)
7. Main stakeholders/beneficiaries of the project
8. Business process category of the project
Regulatory/official control

B. Lessons Learned

9. Summary description of the project/service
a. Objective(s)

To ensure the secure exchange of data between national customs systems related to the international transit of goods, vehicles or containers according to the provisions of the TIR Convention and to allow customs to manage the data on guarantees, issued by guarantee chains to holders authorized to use the TIR system.

b. Business need for the project (background)

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) administers the TIR Convention, which was established in 1959 and extensively revised in 1975 and which has, at present, 76 Contracting Parties. The TIR Convention provides for an internationally recognized procedure to facilitate the cross border transportation of goods in transit through the use of a standard, internationally recognized customs document, the TIR Carnet, which also serves as proof of existence of an internationally valid guarantee. 

For many years the TIR Convention proved to be an efficient facilitation tool. However, with the progress in technology, the use of the paper TIR Carnet is increasingly becoming archaic, in particular when it comes to linking it to the electronic procedures applied by national customs administrations. At each border crossing, customs officers are generally forced to process the paper TIR Carnet on top of the electronic processing in national electronic customs systems. In addition, the current situation does not enable customs authorities to effectively apply risk management procedures based on advance cargo information, as demanded by an increasingly more security-conscious environment. 

The Contracting Parties to the TIR Convention launched in 2003 the so-called “eTIR Project”, aimed at providing an exchange platform for all actors (Customs authorities, holders, guarantee chains) involved in the TIR system, known as the “eTIR international system”. The eTIR international system aims to ensure the secure exchange of data between national customs systems related to the international transit of goods, vehicles or containers according to the provisions of the TIR Convention and to allow customs to manage the data on guarantees, issued by guarantee chains to holders authorized to use the TIR system. 

c. Business process covered*

Development of and international electronic transit system 

d. Overall architecture and functionalities*

eTirThis figure represents the information exchange between the actors in the eTIR system. The eTIR system depends on parallel efforts from contracting parties, transport operators and the guarantee chains to develop/ update and interconnect governmental and private sector ICT systems. 

e. Relevant document/figure
10. Documents and data exchanged via the project

Transit declaration and guarantee information 

11. Data models/databases, proprietary solutions, hybrid approaches
12. Main challenges faced during the project

In the early stages of the project, the guarantee chain, possibly fearing changes in their business model, severely slowed down the project.  

Contracting parties to the TIR convention have only started in 2015 to work on a new Annex to the Convention, which aims at providing the required legal basis for eTIR. Reaching consensus on the news annex has proved challenging and, while almost all contracting parties are ready to adopt the draft annex, discussions are still ongoing to reach a consensus on its finalization and adoption. 

13. Lessons learned from the project

Starting the work on the legal basis in parallel to the preparation of the functional specification could have allowed for an earlier adoption of the legal text and might have helped to speed up the whole project. 

Increased collaboration with the private sector in the early stages of the project could have prevented years of negotiations. 

14. Main benefit(s) of the project
Enhanced regulatory compliance*
Transaction Cost savings*
Transaction Time savings
Simplified process
14A. Elaborations/detailed description on benefits gained

The eTIR system offers benefits to all actors involved in the TIR system. First, it brings additional security and risk management opportunities, thus reducing the risk of fraud. Second, advanced international cooperation will allow all actors to significantly reduce their administrative burden and to maximize the benefits of integrated supply chain management. Finally, the provision of advance cargo information and the exchange of information in real time will speed up the TIR procedure. 

15. Technical/financial/capacity building/other assistance

In 2015, further to the signature of an MoU between UNECE and the IRU in the field of the computerization of the TIR procedure, the IRU provided UNECE with the funds required to start an eTIR pilot project between Iran (Islamic republic of) and Turkey. In 2017, UNECE and IRU signed 5 years MoU and Contributions Agreement aimed at financing the UNECE activities related to projects contributing to the full computerization of the TIR procedure. 

16. Future plan for expansion of the project

Iran and Turkey are preparing a MoU aimed at progressively expand the scope of their eTIR pilot project to all transport operators and all customs. 

Iran and Azerbaijan are starting an eTIR project aimed at improving trade and transport along the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). 

Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine are starting an intermodal eTIR project. 

Finally, the efforts undertaken by all contracting parties to the convention to introduce a new Annex in the convention will provide the legal basis for all contracting parties to operationalize eTIR globally. Taking into consideration that the TIR Convention has seen in recent years a renewed global interest (since 2015 Oman, Argentina, Qatar, the State of Palestine, India, China and Pakistan acceded to the Convection) the potential geographical scope of eTIR is increasing.  

17. Other information or relevant references on the project
18. Relevant document regarding the project

C. Relevant Standards

20. Electronic message standard
20A. Electronic message standard supporting the project
- WCO Data Model
20B. Type of standard for electronic message applied for the project
21. Technical communication standard
21A. Technical communication standard supporting the project
Wed Service Security (WS-S)
21B. Type of technical communication standard applied for the project
International standard
22. Security-related standards*
22A. Security-related standard supporting the project
Wed Service Security (WS-S)
22B. Type of security-related standard applied for the project
Proprietary solution
It is proposed to apply national legislation for authentication mechanisms.
Proprietary solution was applied because:
- No relevant international standard
23. Other Technical Information
23A. Interface developed for data exchange with an internal system
23B. Other technical implementation information